|You Are Here: HOME >> GUEST AUTHORS >> DOUG YURCHEY >> THE PROBLEM WITH ALIENS|
The Problem with Aliens
[A Criticism of the ‘God is an Alien’ Theory)
What one philosophy harmonizes the problems and conflicts? New Age people; some very enlightened and very intelligent students (of what it’s all about) will speak confidently that we, humans, were the result of ALIEN-ENGINEERING. Aliens have been biologically, genetically engineering the human race all along…for thousands of years, they will insist. God is an alien. The philosophy of an Alien-Creator or Creators has a definite appeal. We have the answer of how impossible creations from the past, that require high levels of technology, could have been realistically constructed. We have the possible answer to the question, ‘Where did the old, vast, physical and astronomical knowledge come from?’ Of course, ALIENS accelerated the primitive primates! Ah, wait…there will be bumpy roads ahead on this path. Do not supplant God with aliens. Do not make ‘aliens’ another religion.
Alright, here is where aliens come into the picture. With the logical understanding that there can be only a singular truth, the possibility exists that early extraterrestrials had a hand in our genesis. After all, ET knowledge can account for the prehistoric buildings seemingly made by supermen. Believing the explanation is ‘aliens’ for everything is no better than believing the answer to everything is God. The problem with Von Danikenism is the philosophic Creation-theory still includes ‘primates.’ Von Danikenism was never better illustrated than in A. C. Clarke’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey.’
Directly from Erich Von Daniken comes the plot for the book and film, ‘2001.’ Primal Cro-Magnons are sitting around as stupid as ever. They fight for rights to a water source with another rival tribe. Then, ‘uuuuuuuuuuuuuu!’…a weird thing appears to one of the primates. The creature does not know what a monolith is; it has smooth sides and perfect edges. Our hairy ancestor had never experienced such an amazing wonder. The ‘Cro-Magnon’ thought for the first time. It had the first ‘intelligent’ idea in the early history of the human race. What was the thought? Of course, it was a WEAPON. Soon, the creature shared the discovery with others of his tribe. Very quickly, they all carried bones as weapons and defeated their enemies. This sci-fi was never intended to be sci-fi. It is modern theology masked as a big movie. (‘Stanley Kubrick was brilliant, but…’).
The scenario was a revelation in its time of the nineteen
sixties. Today, evidence suggests the fallacy of a slow/natural
evolution. We should know by now that the ancient stonework is so
old that it nullifies the concept of primitive primates. Why would
Erich Von Daniken and Arthur C. Clarke believe that we evolved from
ape ancestors and express it in their viewpoints? The answer is
these writers, researchers wanted acceptance from the scientific
community for their theories or stories. Clarke and Von Daniken, men
of science, are anti-Intelligent Design. Catering to the scientific
community at the time, right or wrong, their views got supported and
promoted by the establishment. Von Daniken bows to Science. On his
website, the webmaster absolutely does not want to hear from
pseudo-science people or from psychics. They are strictly
science-oriented. Is this because the idea of alien-progenitors is
so outrageous to traditionalists?
Scientists of the present remain locked in a bloodless battle
over Evolution and the basic question of, ‘Did we originate from a
type of ape?’ One scientific movement opposes Darwin. For decades,
they have been called ‘Evolutionists against Darwinism.’ Then, there
are multitudes of Science halls that continue to respect the work of
Charles Darwin. When we watch shows of the future, such as ‘Star
Trek,’ writers remain steadfast in their portrayals of tomorrow’s
scientist’s contentions that we came from primates.
Science-oriented, projected-future shows maintaining Darwinism will
be proven to be fallible and misguided. British halls honoring
Darwin will become obsolete.
What is wrong with an alien-genesis that is updated, without the
need for primate inclusion?
WE CAN THROW AWAY ‘PRIMATES’ LIKE WE HAVE
DISMISSED THE NOTION THAT THE EARTH IS FLAT
Von Danikenism demonstrates a need to discover the one,
all-encompassing Creation hypothesis. One philosophy must harmonize
the real points brought forth by the other, widely divergent,
theories. When we attribute aliens as responsible for the fantastic
creations of prehistory, we greatly diminish what HUMANS have
Von Danikenism, the idea that primates were intellectually
(biologically) stimulated and unnaturally advanced by aliens,
illustrates the need to explain our sudden acceleration.
Author’s note: In the 1970s, Erich Von Daniken was one of my
heroes. I championed his ‘alien’ cause. Today, its ‘primate’ basis
must be challenged. Did aliens play other roles?
Possibly, the entire perspective of traditional thinking is
wrong. Classic Von Danikenism, a third alternative, could also use a
tweak when it misunderstands and begins with inferior proto-humans.
The concept that the first intelligent thought by the first
peoples would be the invention of a ‘weapon’ is offensive.
Eden-in-the-real-world Atlanteans may have been super-humans with
sophisticated technologies at their disposal. By the end of ‘We Are
Fallen Gods,’ readers will be introduced to more pieces of a New
Genesis; a different, unique perspective. If the beginnings of human
life on Earth did not start as we have been taught, and worlds of
science have been shown to be far off the mark, then our genesis
could have been quite opposite from primitive primates. The opposite
is an incredible, Mega-Metropolis run by supermen and superwomen!
It depends on what state of technology you place for the starting
point of the human race on Earth.
Pretend archeologists have ONLY discovered grass huts, simple tools and other crude items of primitive conditions uncovered in rock excavations. This is precisely what we should find of prehistoric times; evidence of that slow move to modernism clearly etched, over time, in stone. This is all we should find if tradition rings true. There would be no squashed trilobites on the bottom of fossilized sandals. There would be no dinosaur tracks along with human tracks at the Paluxy River. Evidence clearly proving Natural Selection should be obvious and stand before us. That evidence has not been found. But, significant mysteries have been discovered. Instead of barbaric beginnings, we have the shattered remnants of a worldwide Metropolis where the ‘same builders’ constructed ‘impossible’ sites forming an ancient World (electrical power) Grid. Researchers should step back and examine the PATTERN or global organization of similar prehistoric sites.
See a new panorama where ‘aliens’ are not the answer for every
mystery of heaven and Earth. UFO saucers, that make impossible turns
at unbelievable speeds, are not necessarily alien. They are probably
crafts made on Earth. (In ‘alien’ is a lie…aLIEn).
What is a truer philosophy? What is the New Genesis? What answer
or philosophy has the least ‘problems’ and could be closest to
historical fact? Later chapters will further explore a new, logical
path to follow. The difficulty is touching the light; hearing the
bell; seeing the trees in spite of the forest. The hardest part is
cutting though the B.S. and the many years of pre-conceived
ignorance. It is extremely difficult to understand what has come
before our modern world. Thanks to our educational systems, which
have been miserable failures, people wallow in streams of cloudy
We still do not know for certain, but that does not stop the
myriad of sources that will inform you precisely what occurred in
the past. The problems are the answers are greatly different. No one
knows the single, unequivocal, truth because you can’t handle the
truth. What this writer/researcher has found after 35 years of
examining the big question of life on Earth, is that the record of
real events more resembles a science-fiction epic. Once you add the
element of high technical advancement among early Indians, the
entire portrait changes. History certainly was never similar to the
dull, drab, slow, cold, conservative, boring picture the
traditionalists paint. Who believes the incredible? Very few do and
the only way to understand the past is to be open to the incredible.
If we cannot accept a New Genesis or new view, then we will continue
to live in foggy ambiguity.
A good idea, if students really care about finding reality, is to
throw everything away that you have ever learned! To repeat, throw
away everything you have ever learned. Start again. This time
question all of it and just consider real, proven facts. Also,
consider the mysteries of life. Do not steer around them. If
mysteries remain, then you have not found the truth. Major enigmas
will disappear in the light of truth.
The next chapters will be hard for readers to digest. Previous
chapters had to lay the foundation that something is very wrong with
the status quo or usual perceptions of the past. Let us draw back
the curtains and view something new and different on stage. Imagine
what ‘the answer’ to human genesis could be. Answers are not
A representation of what really occurred in the past will be
presented in the following pages. Not only will the question of
‘how’ we arrived on Earth be tested, but WHY? WHY are we here? It
might not be as simplistic as ‘to serve God and love one another’ as
suggested. It might boil down to a technical answer whose relevance
only pertained to the world of 50,000 years ago. The true, specific
ANSWER to our existence might not apply or have any real usefulness
today (outside of to those curious few that must know).
If we truly knew for sure, the very least of it results in no
longer believing the lies. Finally; and that would be a very good
thing, indeed. Or, are we so damned apathetic today that relatively
few people have the desire to know? Have we lost our curiosity and
imagination? This writer believes it is very important to know the
‘one truth.’ It is important to not travel along divided, dead-end
roads. It is important to come near the mark and no longer be
unaware. We should emerge out of our dark caves of ignorance and
wonder about the monolith of light we see in front of us. Think for
the first time.
David Hatcher Childress responded after he read my article on
World-Mysteries called ‘Von Daniken’s Mistake.’
Michael A. Cremo also replied and explained where he stood on the
subject. Here was what I wrote in response to his email:
ATLANTIS, Giza, Inca, Stonehenge, Easter Is.,
Zimbabwe, Tassili, Delhi Pillar,
The above article is an excerpt from ‘We Are Fallen Gods.’ Write and see how to get a signed copy of the 300-page manuscript.
Doug Yurchey can be contacted:
Ask how you can get a signed disk of the 300-page ms.
More articles on this website by Doug Yurchey:
Views expressed here are not necessarily endorsed by the hosting organization (World-Mysteries.com), our ISP or any sponsoring individuals or organizations.
Reference to any specific commercial product, process, or services by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the World-Mysteries.com.
Links outside of the World-Mysteries.com web site
(external links) are provided for user convenience and do not
necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or
favoring by the World-Mysteries.com.
1. Please note that articles that are posted on
our website are not necessarily endorsed nor supported by us.
* Failure to do so will result in your ISP and web host being notified as this can be construed as theft and copyright infringement.
WARNING: Many of the statements made here have NOT been evaluated or approved by the F.D.A. We must also legally warn you that even though your medical doctor has had absolutely no training in Herbology or Natural Healing, if you are ill, have any disease or are pregnant or nursing, consult your medical doctor before attempting any natural or herbal program.
Recommended: 1920x1200+ display, CSS and
Java Script support : : : Hosted by Lunarpages
Erich von Daeniken, ‘Ancient
Astronauts, David Hatcher Childress, Michael Cremo, Giorgio A. Tsoukalos,
George Noory, the evolutionists, Von Daniken’s theory of alien contact long ago.